Categories
Digital Health MedTech

From MRI to MedTech: Securing AI-Powered Devices

Your pacemaker is now an endpoint. Attackers read release notes too.

Why Devices + AI Are Tricky

  • Firmware–model coupling, edge inference, constrained compute, long lifetimes.
  • Risks mapped in Biasin et al.’s study on AI medical device cybersecurity (arXiv).

Case in Point

The 2017 firmware recall for ~465k Abbott (St. Jude) pacemakers shows the stakes, a patch was issued to mitigate RF cybersecurity vulnerabilities (Read more).

Regulatory Overlap

  • AI used for medical purposes typically lands in high-risk under the AI Act, layering obligations on top of MDR/IVDR (European Commission).
  • This includes logging, robustness, and human oversight.

Secure Design Patterns

  • Isolation/sandboxing
  • Secure boot + model integrity checks
  • Fail-safe fallback modes
  • Lightweight cryptography
  • Device logging & anomaly detection
  • OTA updates with rollback
  • Adversarial robustness testing

Ship devices with a patch plan, audit trail, and model provenance. Or don’t ship at all.

By Piotr Wrzosinski

Piotr Wrzosinski is a Pharma and MedTech commercialization and digital marketing expert with 20+ years of experience across pharma (Roche, J&J), consulting (Accenture, IQVIA) and medical devices (BD).
He leads transformative EMEA Omnichannel Delivery Center team at Becton Dickinson and shares insights on Pharma, MedTech and Digital Health at disrupting.healthcare to speed up digital innovation in healthcare, because patients are waiting for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version